Page 30 - MBCA_FULL REPORT_FINAL_FOR_WEB
P. 30

translational research (24%), clinical research (6%), and cancer control research (1%). The
                                      percentage of grants in either database addressing particular research areas did not vary
                                      substantially from 2000 through 2013. KOL interviews. We interviewed 59 KOLs in the MBC
                                      space. Four main themes arose from these interviews: (1) the need for a tissue bank that
                                      matches primary tumors with metastatic tumors, (2) the need to standardize metastatic
                                      preclinical models, (3) the need to redesign clinical trials for MBC to measure new endpoints
                                      (beyond MBC tumor shrinkage and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors  [RECIST]  scale)
                                      and to coordinate the trials across multiple investigators and institutions, and (4) the need to
                                      diversify clinical R&D funds to invest in promising new targets, noting there are too many “me
                                      too” drugs, such as PI3K. Conclusions: We were able to successfully categorize most targeted
                                      therapies in clinical trials according to the hallmarks of cancer, and research grants could be
                                      categorized according to the steps of metastasis. In addition, the data gathered from funded
                                      research grants and clinical trials was consistent overall with the research needs identified
                                      by KOLs. The next steps are to better understand why gaps in certain areas exist and develop
                                      strategies to address those gaps.



                                      Introduction

                                      One of 3 mission areas of the Alliance is to advance research focused on extending life,
                                      enhancing quality of life, and ultimately ending death from MBC. To determine how best to
                                      advocate for research in MBC, the Alliance conducted a landscape analysis of MBC research
                                      in addition to separate assessments of patient needs and quality of life (see Chapter 3) and
                                      information and services available for patients (see Chapter 4).


                                      The Alliance’s research landscape analysis is an effort to identify gaps in and opportunities for
                                      MBC research by analyzing currently active clinical trials and information on previously funded
                                      biomedical research grants as well as by interviewing KOLs in the MBC space. By understanding
                                      and reporting on MBC research gaps and opportunities, Alliance members and others can
                                      advocate for, and potentially fund, the MBC research that is most needed.

                                      The Alliance believes this exercise of reviewing and categorizing MBC research and
                                      understanding key expert opinions will enable us to target our own efforts and to inform the
                                      larger cancer community. Our goal is to advance research more rapidly and help accelerate the
                                      development of new treatments that extend the life span of, while maintaining a high quality of
                                      life for, people living with MBC.


















         30
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35